Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Blog Article
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only carried out Should the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence along with the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were effectively mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The main objectives of police will be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and above all ensure regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
14. Within the light in the position explained earlier mentioned, it is concluded that a civil servant provides a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be regarded as for no fault of his own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the length of service or inside the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, plus the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as a legally identified conviction. Read more
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as set forth would not implement, as the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, relatively he has long been acquitted in the criminal charges based on evidence and it can be well-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted inside the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment because of the department and held him disqualified with the post because acquittal for all long term purposes. The aforesaid proposition is established at naught by the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case on the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.
Even though there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds minor sway. Still, if there is not any precedent within the home state, relevant case legislation from another state might be viewed as from the court.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight presented to any reported judgment may perhaps count on the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[7]
We are an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of regulation and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed through the Constitution and laws in the United States and this State.
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of your boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of your Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian ad litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for the dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all performing in their Careers with DCFS.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair for the offender and also the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained read more unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe to be a foster child. Even though the few had two younger children of their personal at home, the social worker didn't tell them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report towards the court the following day, the worker reported the boy’s placement during the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair experienced younger children.
Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is arrived at, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a very well-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.